High voltage transmission lines
interconnect utilities, generating stations, major load centers, and transfer
power between utilities. The U.S. electricity transmission system is an
extensive, interconnected network of high-voltage power lines that transport
electricity from generators to consumers. The transmission system must be
flexible enough, every second of every day, to accommodate the nation’s
growing demand for reliable and affordable electricity.
Institutional and technological changes in
transmission system engineering and operation are forthcoming and hold the
potential for increased capacity and efficiency of the transmission grid.
However, there is a constant tension between the cost of such transmission
improvements and the associated benefits.
In addition, due to load diversity between
utilities and geographic regions, improved transmission links can often
reduce the need for total installed generation and spinning reserve
requirements. This lessened need for generation and spinning reserves can
lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Higher capacity
transmission systems, including HVDC, could also increase the availability
and economic viability of renewable resources that are remote from load
centers.
The historical reasons for transmission
system expansion have generally been tied to:
| |
 |
Integrating
electric generation sources to serve defined customer demands in a
specified area or region |
| |
 |
Providing
flexibility to handle shifts in facility loadings caused by
maintenance and forced outages of generation and transmission
equipment |
| |
 |
Sharing generating
capacity through diversity in customer demands and generation
availability |
| |
 |
Allowing for the
economic exchange of electric power among neighboring systems when
temporary surpluses in generating capacity are available |
These reasons for transmission development,
expansion, and reinforcement must now be reexamined in the context of
competitive electricity markets. These markets require transmission
expansion not only to interconnect new generation capacity but also to
provide flexibility for the delivery of that generation capacity to
customers. Both the customer’s selection of supplier and the customer’s load
variations with time must be considered.
The ability of the electric transmission
systems to transfer electric power among their interconnected elements and
deliver power may be limited by the physical and electrical characteristics
of the systems including thermal, voltage, and stability limits.
Transmission systems are being subjected to power flows in magnitude and
directions that were not considered when the systems were planned. In many
instances, these new flow patterns result in an increasing number of
transmission facilities being identified as limits to electric power
delivery or transfers. Increasingly, more electricity is being shipped
longer distances over a transmission system that was initially designed only
to provide limited power and reserve sharing among neighboring utilities.
The text below discusses several specific
areas for transmission improvements:
| |
 |
High Voltage
Direct Current (HVDC) Transmission |
| |
 |
Controlling
Transmission Line Flows |
| |
 |
Conductor Loss
Optimization and Phase Current Optimization |
| |
 |
Increasing
Transmission Line Voltage |
| |
 |
Build New
Transmission Lines |
High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) Transmission
High Voltage Direct Current (HVDC)
systems transmit power using direct current (DC), which flows in one
direction only. The vast majority of transmission lines in existence today
use alternating current (AC), where the current reverses direction 60 times
per second.
As AC power is delivered on a transmission
line, the electricity tends to travel through the outer portion of the
conductor, not evenly over the cross section of the conductor. This is
called the "skin effect" and effectively increases the electrical resistance
of the conductor to AC current. The increased resistance, in turn, slightly
increases electrical losses on AC transmission lines (up to 0.5 percent).
DC power delivery produces just the
opposite effect. Electricity travels more evenly over the entire cross
section of the conductor. DC operation is bi-polar, requiring only two
conductors, whereas three-phase AC transmission systems require at least
three conductors. A typical HVDC line design can have less than 50 percent
of the losses associated with an AC line of the same power transfer
capability. The per mile construction costs of the HVDC line are also
considerably less. However, the fixed terminal costs for HVDC equipment
preclude the use of HVDC except for very long lines or other special
situations. Applications of HVDC can be for new lines or conversion of
existing AC lines.
Power system losses in the United States
amount to billions of kWh annually. HVDC transmission lines could
potentially reduce a portion of those losses and the electric generation
necessary to replace them. To the extent that this generation was
fossil-fired, greenhouse gas emissions would also be reduced.
Controlling Transmission Line Flows
Improved power electronics incorporating
the new technology of large silicon, solid-state switches, called thyristors,
can help utilities increase transmission system capacity while reducing
susceptibility to power disturbances, thus enhancing the control of power
flow.
By increasing or decreasing the power flow
on specific lines, utilities can tailor power delivery strategies to best
utilize their systems and reduce problems associated with loop flow. System
optimization will allow more effective integration and use of renewable
energy, energy storage, and demand-side management resources in the electric
system, leading to possible further greenhouse gas reductions.
Savings may also be realized from reduced
spinning reserve requirements in the generating capacity needed to serve as
backup, rather than to meet actual demand for electricity. Reduced spinning
reserve requirements could reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and air
pollutants. Additional savings can result by balancing phase currents,
thereby reducing the amount of losses associated with residual currents.
Increasing the current flow on a
transmission line, however, will increase line losses. These losses require
the generation of additional electricity, which could result in additional
greenhouse gas emissions. Any increased emissions must be considered in
evaluating the net impact of the project.
The resistance a conductor offers to the
flow of electricity is inversely proportional to its cross-sectional area,
i.e., the larger the diameter of the conductor, the less resistance the
current will encounter. Resistance is also a function of the type of
material of which the conductor is made. Thus, by replacing a conductor with
one of a larger diameter or changing to a material which offers less
resistance, power loss can be reduced when the same current is flowing
through the conductor. Segmenting shield wires can also eliminate losses
associated with loop flows through this path.
Increasing the voltage of a transmission
line increases the efficiency of transmission of electricity over the line.
Using the highest transmission voltage that is operationally and
economically justified can reduce line losses. Increasing the voltage of an
existing transmission line in many instances is an effective way of
increasing the utilization of the line, and, because of the increased
efficiency, less electricity would be required to be generated to provide
the same service to the end customer. Consequently, less fuel is consumed,
which could result in reduced greenhouse gas emissions.
The location of power lines which transmit
electricity from generating facilities to points for distribution to
customers often does not optimize power delivery efficiency. This may be due
to changes in customer demand or location after transmission lines were
installed or attempts to avoid installation of expensive new transmission
facilities.
Proper placement of new transmission
lines, especially around metro areas, can significantly reduce transmission
losses. Reduced losses result in reduced generation requirements, with
subsequent reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Also, there are areas in the U.S. which
have more generating capacity than their own system requires, even when
considering reserve requirements. In many cases, this spare capacity is more
efficient or produces less greenhouse gases than power produced in other
systems (e.g., renewable or nuclear energy). This capacity could be made
available to other entities that have a capacity shortage or more
carbon-intensive fueled generation. There are other instances where
diversity in system loads would permit utilities to share generation. This
would reduce energy consumption for spinning reserve and reduce overall
generation requirements.
The primary obstacle to efficiently
resolving these situations is the lack of transmission line capacity between
the affected entities. New transmission lines can make a contribution to
reducing greenhouse gas emissions through more efficient operation of
interconnected systems.
Click here
or
on "Add PPRG Content" above to
offer your
comments to the PPRG.