| |
|
|
|
Navigate the
Resource Guide:
Table of Contents

Major Topic Sections







Related topics in this section







 |
|
Reducing GHG Intensity at
Fossil-Fueled Plants
|
| |
|
Background |
|
Fossil fuels have been a major contributor to the high standard of living
enjoyed by the industrialized world. In the U.S., use of fossil fuel is
increasingly as a fuel for generating electricity. Indeed, the U.S.
electricity system is a world-class asset, supplying relatively low-cost and
reliable power for homes and businesses. The U.S. grid is powered mostly by
low-cost and abundant fossil fuel resources, particularly coal. The fuel
supply systems, generating assets, and transmission and distribution grids
collectively represent a huge capital investment in infrastructure.
The availability of low-cost electricity
has accelerated the electrification of our energy system, with an
ever-growing share of our energy use comprised of electricity. In 1960, 18.1
percent of total energy consumption was in the form of energy input to
electric utilities. By 2000, while total energy consumption more than
doubled, electricity demand went up fivefold, now accounting for nearly 40
percent of total U.S. energy consumption.
For decades, coal has been the dominant
source of electricity in the United States. As it is abundant,
geographically widespread, and inexpensive to mine, coal has powered more
than half of all electricity use since 1950.
Fossil energy is too large a part of the
global economy and too inherently cost-effective to realistically be
eliminated from the world’s energy mix. Our efforts to tackle CO2 emissions cannot be blind to this reality. The
continued use of fossil fuels to generate affordable electricity is
critically important to the United States and other world economies. The
power generation industry needs to maintain a diversified fuel mix to ensure
adequate energy supplies at a reasonable price.
To calculate a nation’s CO2
emissions, we can use the following simple formula:
|
CO2
emissions = |
GDP |
($ of economic activity) |
| |
* Btu/$GDP |
(energy efficiency) |
| |
* carbon/Btu |
(carbon intensity) |
| |
– CO2 removal |
(carbon sequestration) |
Using this formula, we can identify three
primary means to reduce CO2
emissions without reducing economic output. One can (1) increase the
efficiency of energy conversion and end-use processes, (2) shift to lower
carbon fuels (including non-carbon sources such as renewable energy and
nuclear power), and/or (3) sequester the carbon released in energy
production. While there are literally hundreds of activities that can be
undertaken to reduce CO2
emissions to the atmosphere, most activities fall into one of these
categories. These are the three major pathways we can follow in controlling
the emissions of CO2
associated with energy production. All of these options are discussed in
this and other sections of the Power Partners℠ Resource Guide.
This section of the Power Partners℠
Resource Guide presents
many options for GHG reductions at fossil-fired plants. Some of the topics
relate to improving the efficiency (heat rate) at existing fossil-fired
units. Other topics focus more on new or rebuilt generating capacity,
reducing CO2 emissions
either by improved generating efficiency and/or by increased use of
lower-carbon fossil fuels.
Improvements in fossil-fired power
generation technology, how power plants are operated and maintained, and
where on the grid they are located, can measurably reduce both GHG emissions
and operating costs. Improvements in efficiency of new and existing
generation plants can take many forms. Some are listed below; and the
following pages discuss these and other related options in greater depth:
| |
 |
Advanced coal-fueled systems.
The development and
deployment of affordable, efficient new coal technologies that produce
less CO2
is key to meeting targets for reducing CO2
without risking global economic instability.
Several types of advanced coal-fueled technologies are in various
stages of development, including supercritical and ultra-supercritical
PC units, fluidized-bed combustion technologies, and integrated
gasification combined cycle (IGCC) technology. Compared to
conventional pulverized coal-fired systems, these advanced
technologies offer potentially greater efficiency and lower emissions.
Additionally, some are inherently better suited to the capture and
sequestration of CO2, should
those emissions also need control.
|
| |
 |
Turbine efficiency improvements.
Advances in turbine technologies are improving overall heat rates and
unit efficiency, reducing fuel consumption and CO2 emissions per kWh
generated.
|
| |
 |
Repowering.
Repowering is the replacement of the steam-producing equipment.
Typically, repowering results in far fewer Btu needed to generate each
kWh of electricity, thereby reducing the associated
CO2
emissions. Additionally, where repowering also includes a fuel switch
to natural gas, the lower carbon content of the fuel leads to further
CO2 reductions.
|
| |
 |
Cogeneration and Combined Heat
and Power (CHP). By
capturing and using waste heat, other fuels for producing steam and/or
hot water can be avoided, thereby saving fuel and the associated
CO2 emissions.
|
| |
 |
Natural Gas.
Natural gas has the lowest carbon content of
any fossil fuel. For example, bituminous coal has a carbon content of
about 205 lbs. CO2/MMBtu.
In contrast, the carbon content of natural gas is only about 117 lbs.
CO2/MMBtu. By
increasing the use of natural gas for the production of electricity in
lieu of other fossil fuels, the
CO2 emissions per MMBtu are reduced. |
| |
 |
Upgrading controls. Upgrading
plant instrumentation and control systems and plant equipment, e.g.,
using variable speed motors for fans and pumps are actions that can
improve efficiency and reduce GHG emissions.
|
| |
 |
Improvements in coal preparation
and handling. Improving
the quality of the coal can reduce materials handling and lower heat
rates.
|
Click here
or
on "Add PPRG Content" above to
offer your
comments to the PPRG.
|
|
Power Partners℠
Projects |
Note: Most Power Partners℠ projects within this section
will likely be listed under one of the specific topics. Projects described
below are those that relate to the section contents more broadly.
CoalFleet for Tomorrow.
CoalFleet for Tomorrow is an industry-led, broad-based collaborative formed
to accelerate the commercial deployment of advanced coal power systems,
including Ultra-Supercritical Pulverized Coal (USC PC) and Integrated
Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC). For each technology, CoalFleet has
assembled world-class expert working groups with an extensive amount of
design experience. The expert groups supplement the expertise of Electric
Power Research Institute (EPRI) staff members with plant managers and
retired engineers from supplier companies—in short, the best talent from the
United States and Europe.
http://www.epriweb.com/public/000000000001014845.pdf
Clean Coal Power
Initiative (CCPI). "Clean coal technology" describes a new
generation of energy processes that sharply reduce air emissions and other
pollutants from coal-burning power plants. In the late 1980s and early
1990s, the U.S. Department of Energy conducted a joint program with industry
and State agencies to demonstrate the best of these new technologies at
scales large enough for companies to make commercial decisions. More than 20
of the technologies tested in the original program achieved commercial
success. With coal likely to remain one of the nation's lowest-cost electric
power sources for the foreseeable future, President Bush has pledged a new
commitment to even more advanced clean coal technologies. The Clean Coal
Power Initiative is providing government co-financing for new coal
technologies that can help utilities meet the President's Clear Skies
Initiative to cut sulfur, nitrogen and mercury pollutants from power plants
by nearly 70 percent by the year 2018. Also, some of the early projects are
showing ways to reduce greenhouse emissions by boosting the efficiency at
which coal plants convert coal to electricity or other energy forms.
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/powersystems/cleancoal/index.html
FutureGen Clean Coal Projects
is an initiative
to equip multiple new clean coal power plants with advanced carbon capture
and storage (CCS) technology. On February 27, 2003, the federal
government announced FutureGen, a $1 billion initiative to create a
coal-based power plant focused on demonstrating a revolutionary clean coal
technology that would produce hydrogen and electricity and mitigate
greenhouse gas emissions. FutureGen's restructured approach proposes federal
funding to demonstrate cutting-edge CCS technology at multiple
commercial-scale integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) coal power
plants. It includes engagement with the international community which will
remain integral to advancing CCS technology on a global scale.
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/powersystems/futuregen/index.html
Click here
or
on "Add PPRG Content" above to add your
organization's projects.
|
|
References, Sources,
and
Other
Useful Data |
|
Below are some links and resources that pertain to fossil energy efficiency
improvements and GHG reductions in general. Additional resources are
provided for the specific topic areas indicated by the link bar on the left
of this page.
Electric Power
Research Institute, “CoalFleet for Tomorrow”
http://www.epriweb.com/public/000000000001014845.pdf
CoalFleet for Tomorrow ("CoalFleet") is an industry-led, broad-based
collaborative research program founded with the goal of making a portfolio
of advanced coal technologies more accessible and affordable for power
producers and society. Managed by
EPRI, CoalFleet brings together power generators from five continents,
turbine and boiler suppliers, EPC (engineer-procure-construct) companies
from around the world, research partners such as the U.S. Department of
Energy, and others. Technologies covered by CoalFleet include integrated
gasification combined cycle (IGCC), ultra-supercritical pulverized coal (USC
PC), and supercritical circulating fluidized-bed combustion (SC CFBC).
CoalFleet is especially focused on incorporating user requirements and
lessons learned from existing IGCC and advanced PC and CFBC plants (as well
as new developments) into new designs being developed for potential
commercial orders, helping spur reductions in capital cost and risk for
subsequent orders as well as improvements in plant availability and
performance.
U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Industrial
Technologies Program, “BestPractices”
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/bestpractices/
BestPractices, a program of the U.S.
Department of Energy's (DOE) Industrial Technologies Program (ITP), works
with industry to identify plant-wide opportunities for energy savings and
process efficiency. Through the implementation of new technologies and
systems improvements, companies across the United States are achieving
immediate savings results.
U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Industrial
Technologies Program, “Industrial Assessment Centers”
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/bestpractices/iacs.html
The Industrial Assessment Centers program
enables eligible small and medium-sized manufacturers to have comprehensive
industrial assessments performed at no cost to the manufacturer. This web
site is intended to provide an overview of the sources of services,
self-help tools and expertise currently available to manufacturers
throughout the U.S.
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Industrial Technologies Program, “OIT
Times: States' Options for NICE3 Participation Broadened” (January 2, 2002
News Release)
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/newsandevents/news_detail.html?news_id=7633
OIT’s National Industrial Competitiveness
through Energy, Environment, and Economics (NICE3) program provides funding
to state-industry partnerships for projects that demonstrate advances in
energy efficiency and clean production. State-industry partnerships can get
one-time Federal grants of up to $525,000 with the industrial partner
receiving up to $500,000.
U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, “Clean Coal Technology & The President's
Clean Coal Power Initiative”
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/powersystems/cleancoal/index.html
The Clean Coal Power Initiative, is providing government co-financing for
new coal technologies that can help utilities meet the President's Clear
Skies Initiative to cut sulfur, nitrogen and mercury pollutants from power
plants by nearly 70 percent by the year 2018. Also, some of the early
projects are showing ways to reduce greenhouse emissions by boosting the
efficiency at which coal plants convert coal to electricity or other energy
forms.
U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Fossil Energy, “FutureGen Clean Coal Projectst”
http://www.fossil.energy.gov/programs/powersystems/futuregen/index.html
FutureGen Clean Coal Projects is an
initiative
to equip multiple new clean coal power plants with advanced carbon capture
and storage (CCS) technology. On February 27, 2003, the federal
government announced FutureGen, a $1 billion initiative to create a
coal-based power plant focused on demonstrating a revolutionary clean coal
technology that would produce hydrogen and electricity and mitigate
greenhouse gas emissions. FutureGen's restructured approach proposes federal
funding to demonstrate cutting-edge CCS technology at multiple
commercial-scale integrated gasification combined-cycle (IGCC) coal power
plants. It includes engagement with the international community which will
remain integral to advancing CCS technology on a global scale.
Click here
or
on "Add PPRG Content" above to add additional references and sources. |
|